The Nature of True Goodness: Exploring Free Will and Divine Justice
The concept of goodness is often debated, particularly when considering the role of free will and divine intervention. Is true goodness something imposed, or does it arise from the choices we make ourselves? Examining this question reveals insights into the nature of free will, divine justice, and the very essence of what it means to be truly good.
Free Will and the Capacity for Good
The text emphasizes the importance of free will in defining genuine goodness. It argues that "he who is good by his own choice is really good; but he who is made good by another under necessity is not really good, because he is not what he is by his own choice." (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt) This suggests that forced compliance or predetermined behavior, even if seemingly virtuous, lacks the essential element of personal agency that constitutes true goodness.
The Significance of Choice
The freedom to choose between good and evil is presented as a fundamental aspect of human existence. This freedom allows for the possibility of genuine friendship or hostility, shaped by individual decisions and actions. Without this capacity for choice, actions become mere reflexes, devoid of moral significance.
Divine Justice and Long-Suffering
The text addresses the question of why God doesn't simply make everyone good. It suggests that God's long-suffering and patience towards those in impiety stem from a "merciful and philanthropic father" knowing that "impious men become pious." (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt) This implies a belief in the potential for transformation and the value of allowing individuals the time and opportunity to choose righteousness.
God's Goodness and Justice Intertwined
The text explores the relationship between God's goodness and justice. It posits that God is good in His long-suffering with the penitent, welcoming them back, but just in acting as judge, giving to each according to their deserts. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt) This balance underscores the complexity of the divine character, encompassing both mercy and fairness.
The Problem of Worship and Accountability
The text raises the issue of misplaced worship, noting that some worship the sun, moon, earth, and even man. It argues that "it is not the thing that is worshipped that sins; for it suffers violence at the hands of him who will worship it." (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt) This highlights the responsibility of the worshipper and raises questions about accountability for those who are misled or ignorant.
God's Refusal to Participate in Deceit
The text presents the idea that God doesn't act when asked alongside false idols because He refuses to be an accomplice in deceit. When God confers a benefit, the credit should not go to an idol that has done nothing. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt) This suggests that God's actions are deliberate and aimed at revealing truth, not reinforcing falsehoods.
Conclusion
The exploration of free will, divine justice, and the nature of goodness reveals a complex interplay of choice, accountability, and divine attributes. True goodness, according to the text, is not simply an imposed state but a quality arising from the exercise of free will and the conscious decision to embrace righteousness. God's long-suffering and ultimate judgment reflect a balance of mercy and justice, offering individuals the opportunity to choose good while holding them accountable for their actions.