The Nature of True Goodness: Choice vs. Necessity

The pursuit of goodness is a fundamental aspect of human existence. But what truly defines "goodness"? Is it an inherent quality bestowed upon us, or is it something we actively cultivate through our choices? This question delves into the heart of free will and its relationship to genuine moral character.

Free Will and Moral Character

The text emphasizes the importance of free will in defining true goodness. It argues that being good by choice is fundamentally different from being good out of necessity.

he who is good by his own choice is really good; but he who is made good by another under necessity is not really good, because he is not what he is by his own choice. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt)

This suggests that actions performed under compulsion or external influence lack the moral weight of those freely chosen. True goodness stems from an internal decision to act virtuously, not from an imposed obligation.

The Implications of Compulsion

If individuals were compelled to be good, their actions would be devoid of personal meaning and moral value. Their behavior would simply be a reflection of external control, rather than an expression of their own character. The text argues that freedom is essential for the manifestation of both good and evil.

Since therefore every one's freedom constitutes the true good, and shows the true evil, God has contrived that friendship or hostility should be in each man by occasions. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt)

This perspective highlights the inherent risk associated with free will. The capacity for good necessarily implies the possibility of choosing evil.

The Danger of Blasphemy

The text strongly condemns the notion that God dictates our thoughts and actions, particularly when it comes to immoral behavior.

For if we are under His influence in all that we think, you say that He is the cause of fornications, lusts, avarice, and all blasphemy. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt)

Attributing such actions to divine influence is considered blasphemous, as it absolves individuals of responsibility for their choices and casts God as the author of evil. Instead, the text emphasizes the importance of honoring God and acknowledging His goodness.

God's Justice and Long-Suffering

The text touches upon the concept of God's justice and goodness, illustrating that these qualities are not mutually exclusive. God's goodness is demonstrated through his patience and willingness to welcome those who repent.

For He is good, in that He is now long-suffering with the penitent, and welcomes them; but just, when acting as judge He will give to every one according to his deserts. (Source: Document: 1739759105915-3cgekr-anf08.txt)

However, justice demands that individuals ultimately be held accountable for their actions. This balance between mercy and judgment reflects the complex nature of divine justice.

Conclusion

The passage underscores the importance of free will in the development of moral character. True goodness, according to this perspective, is not a state of enforced compliance, but rather a conscious choice to act virtuously. This freedom carries with it the potential for both good and evil, making personal responsibility a cornerstone of moral and spiritual growth.